The controversy arises from a chapter included in an NCERT textbook for grade 8 that addresses the issue of 'Corruption in the Judiciary'. This inclusion has sparked significant backlash, prompting the central government and the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) to issue clarifications. Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan expressed his regret over the situation, emphasizing that there was no intention to insult the judiciary, and he assured that accountability measures would be implemented for those involved in the chapter's preparation. He reiterated the government's commitment to upholding the highest respect for the judiciary and affirmed adherence to court directives.

The Chief Justice of India (CJI) has also voiced strong criticism of the chapter's content. During proceedings where the Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of the issue, CJI D.Y. Chandrachud described the inclusion of such material as akin to 'firing the first shot at the judiciary'. This pointed critique indicates serious concerns over how this portrayal affects the perception of the judiciary among students and educators. The court expressed worry that if students and teachers encounter such prejudiced narratives, it could fundamentally alter their understanding of judicial processes and integrity.

As the government navigates through this backlash, the implications of this incident are significant not only for educational policies but also for the relationship between the judiciary and the executive in India. The controversy raises questions about the appropriateness of textbook content and whether such depictions might erode trust in judicial institutions. Moving forward, the central government must carefully consider the balance between critical educational discourse and the respect accorded to essential institutions like the judiciary, ensuring that students receive a balanced perspective without undermining the rule of law.