The Supreme Court of India recently conducted a suo motu hearing concerning a contentious chapter on 'Judiciary Corruption' that is included in the NCERT curriculum. Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant expressed grave concerns over the contents of the chapter, indicating that it paints a negative image of the Indian judiciary. In his remarks, he highlighted the importance of fostering respect for the judicial system and underscored that educational materials should not convey a biased viewpoint that could undermine public trust in the judiciary.

During the hearing, CJI Surya Kant ordered the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) to comprehensively review the chapter and take necessary steps to remove it from the educational syllabus. This directive underscores the Court's role in ensuring the integrity of the educational content that students are exposed to, especially concerning sensitive topics like judicial corruption. The discussion reflects broader societal concerns regarding the portrayal of institutions in educational literature and the balance between criticism and constructive dialogue.

The decision by the Supreme Court can have significant implications for how educational materials are created and reviewed in India, especially regarding contentious subjects. It highlights the need for accountability among educational bodies to avoid disseminating information that could lead to misinterpretations of institutions critical to democracy. This move also signals the judiciary's proactive stance in protecting its image while also ensuring that education is free from biases that may skew perspectives on justice and integrity in the legal system.