The Supreme Court of India is currently hearing a critical case concerning a controversial chapter titled 'Judiciary Corruption' found in 32 textbooks published by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT). This chapter has drawn significant scrutiny, leading to a legal challenge that questions the integrity and curriculum choice of educational materials. Chief Justice Surya Kant has taken a firm stance in the proceedings, rejecting the central government's apology over the issue and demanding accountability from those responsible for including this chapter in the curriculum.

During the hearings, Chief Justice Surya Kant expressed concern about the implications of the chapter and the potential impact on students' understanding of the judiciary. He directed the government to disclose the names of those accountable for the decision to incorporate the chapter into the textbooks, emphasizing the need for transparency and responsibility within educational frameworks. The call for 'strict action' indicates a serious commitment from the court to address what has been perceived as a failure in the educational system.

This hearing not only highlights the ongoing tensions between the judiciary and the executive in India but also raises important questions about educational content and the role of governmental bodies in shaping what is taught in schools. The Supreme Court's intervention signifies a critical moment in demanding reforms and ensuring that students receive an unbiased and accurate representation of India's judicial system within their educational resources.