A significant controversy has arisen regarding the inclusion of a chapter on judicial corruption in the Class 8 NCERT textbooks in India. Responding to the issue, the Supreme Court of India has taken suo motu cognizance, signaling its serious concern about the implications of such content. The Chief Justice of India has described this as a 'calculated and deep conspiracy' against the judiciary, asserting that the court will not permit anyone to question the institution's reputation or undermine its image.

The mention of 'Judicial Corruption' in the textbooks has drawn backlash from several senior lawyers and judges, who argue that this portrayal tarnishes the image of the judiciary and may mislead students about the integrity of the court system. Such concerns highlight the sensitivity surrounding judicial matters in India and the potential consequences of framing these issues within educational contexts. By addressing this matter vigorously, the Supreme Court aims to safeguard the integrity of the judicial institution and reassure the public of its commitment to justice and honesty.

This case raises important discussions about the balance between educational content and the preservation of institutional reputation. As the debate continues, it underscores the need for careful consideration in how sensitive subjects like corruption within judicial frameworks are taught in schools. The Supreme Court's intervention illustrates its critical role in overseeing not just judicial conduct but also the narratives disseminated through educational channels in the country, signaling that it remains vigilant against perceived threats to its honor and functioning.