In a recent commentary, Jakob Kübarsepp discusses the critical need for the Estonian language to maintain its status as a robust language for science and higher education. He stresses that without a systematic national approach to its development, the language risks becoming marginalized in academic and scientific contexts. This requires an overhaul of how language is perceived and utilized within these fields, ensuring that Estonian is not treated as a lesser or secondary language.

Kübarsepp advocates for systematic work in terminology, arguing that every professional term must have a clear and specific meaning to ensure effective communication. He outlines that the results of systematic collection, description, and structuring of concepts and their corresponding terms should culminate in specialized terminology dictionaries and standards. Such resources are essential for fostering precise communication across various sectors including law, medicine, administration, and technology, where ambiguities can lead to misunderstandings and even serious errors.

The role of clear and organized professional vocabulary is paramount, particularly within legal and official documentation where the meaning of words can have significant implications. Kübarsepp’s insights point to a larger conversation about language preservation and the need for proactive measures to maintain the use of the Estonian language in fields that impact society at large, highlighting that academic respect and systematic support are key to ensuring its continued relevance.