The Court of Justice of Minas Gerais has launched an investigation into Judge Magid Nauef Láuar after he acquitted an individual accused of raping a 12-year-old girl. This decision has garnered significant attention, leading to actions from the court to address public concerns about the ruling. According to the vice-governor Mateus Simões, the court's president has assured that the inquiry will be expedited, reflecting the gravity of the allegations and the potential implications for the judicial system.

The procedure initiated is based on resolution No. 135 of 2011 from the National Justice Council (CNJ), which outlines penalties for judges who might engage in functional misconduct. These penalties can range from warnings and reprimands to more severe actions such as removal or compulsory retirement. The ongoing investigation not only scrutinizes the judge's decision but also assesses the administrative responsibilities expected of magistrates within the Brazilian legal framework.

Additionally, while the inquiry is active, Judge Láuar has been restricted from making public statements, a standard measure in such cases to ensure the integrity of the investigation. Alongside this court inquiry, there is a concurrent investigation from the CNJ's corregedoria into the judge's conduct, highlighting a dual layer of oversight aimed at maintaining judicial accountability and public trust in the legal system in Brazil.