The National Justice Council (CNJ) has opened a formal investigation into a controversial decision made by the Minas Gerais Court of Justice (TJMG) that acquitted a 35-year-old man accused of sexually assaulting a 12-year-old girl. The CNJ's action follows public outcry and media reports concerning the case, particularly focusing on the judge's reasoning which centered around the claimed existence of a 'consensual affective bond' between the alleged perpetrator and the victim. This rationale has sparked considerable debate about legal definitions of consent, especially concerning minors, and the responsibilities of the judicial system in protecting vulnerable populations.

In the initial verdict, the lower court had sentenced the accused to nine years and four months in prison, which was overturned by the TJMG under the ruling of Judge Magid Nauef Láuar. The ruling faced harsh criticism for its implications regarding the understanding of sexual crimes against minors. The CNJ has mandated that the TJMG and Judge Láuar provide explanations within five days, indicating the urgency and seriousness with which this matter is being treated. The outcome of this investigation could have substantial repercussions for the judicial approach to sexual offenses in Brazil, particularly regarding the protection of minors and the standards of evidence needed to convict in such cases.

As the CNJ moves forward with its inquiry, it faces pressure from various advocacy groups and the public, demanding accountability and stricter interpretations of laws surrounding sexual crimes against children. This case not only highlights the complexities involved in cases of sexual violence but also shines a light on the broader societal challenges related to the treatment of vulnerable individuals within the judicial framework. The inquiry's findings could lead to changes in judicial procedures and possibly influence legislative measures aiming to safeguard minors more effectively from sexual predators.