In a move to address technological changes affecting personal rights, a proposal was introduced in Mexico on February 13 to recognize and protect the human voice legally. This would prevent the use of an individual's voice without prior and informed consent, positioning it as part of their image rights. However, this initiative faces scrutiny over how it practically defines and enforces these rights amid existing legal complexities.

The proposed reform attempts to provide protections specific to voice under the framework of intellectual property, modifying the Federal Copyright Law to incorporate this 'sui generis' approach. Critics argue that this represents a piecemeal solution to a larger issue, as it attempts to intertwine voice protection with the existing, perhaps inadequate, rights tied to personal image. This approach raises concerns about the proper alignment of rights in an already intricate legal landscape, particularly regarding the implementation of appropriate procedures and penalties.

Overall, while the initiative aims to shield individuals from unauthorized use of their voice in a rapidly evolving technological environment, it also highlights ongoing challenges in defining and protecting personal rights effectively. The question remains whether such reforms will meaningfully address the rights of the affected individuals or simply add complication to the legal framework surrounding personal image and identity.