The city of Oulu, Finland, has decided to maintain its use of AI-generated images in its communications despite criticism. The city officials have stated that they will sharpen the guidelines related to the use of artificial intelligence, ensuring that it is employed thoughtfully and responsibly. This decision comes in the wake of a motion presented by council members Elisa Hallapuro and Mimmi Jakola, who have advocated for the cessation of AI-generated images and art in the city’s marketing and communication initiatives.

The motion's proponents argue that the use of AI-generated images is unethical and undermines local artists who could find themselves in difficult positions due to the advancements in AI technology. They believe that the city should instead offer support to local artisans and creators, emphasizing the importance of preserving human creativity over artificial creation. Concerns have also been raised regarding the potential negative impact on Oulu's image during its year as a cultural capital, suggesting that reliance on AI could lead to a significant reputational damage.

Moreover, the motion underscores economic and ecological concerns, noting that using AI-generated images is not free, both financially and environmentally. As such, there is a call for Oulu to reconsider its stance on this issue, particularly when there is a wealth of talent in the local creative sector. The ongoing debate reflects broader global tensions around the implication of AI in creative fields, weighing the convenience and allure of technology against the potential detriment it poses to traditional arts and local economies.