Enrico Aimi, a lay member of Italy's High Council of the Judiciary (CSM), has reacted strongly to comments made by Naples Prosecutor Nicola Gratteri, who linked supporters of a referendum to criminal behavior. Aimi argues that Gratteri's remarks are not only inappropriate but also counterproductive, as they provoke the 'Yes' supporters to turn out and vote to disassociate themselves from any suggestive criminal implications. This statement highlights the contentious atmosphere surrounding the referendum and the interplay between law and electoral politics in Italy.

In response to Gratteri's accusations, Aimi has proposed that the CSM initiate a formal investigation into the prosecutor’s conduct and also involve the Supreme Court to assess potential disciplinary actions against him. This situation raises questions about the mechanisms in place for holding judicial figures accountable for their public statements and the kind of consequences they might face. The process is reportedly straightforward, involving the transmission of a request to the CSM's Presidency Committee for action.

The implications of this unfolding situation are significant as they underscore the tensions between legal officials and political discourse in Italy. If Gratteri were to face sanctions, it would set a precedent regarding how public servants can express political opinions and the risks involved. Additionally, this incident could influence public perception of judicial independence and the electoral process ahead of the upcoming referendum, potentially swaying voter sentiment further and impacting the political landscape in the country.