Justice Minister Carlo Nordio commented on the CSM's assessment of the situation surrounding Prosecutor Nicola Gratteri, stating that their document managed to combine the most contorted expressions with the least credibility. Nordio expressed concern regarding the implications of the Council's remarks, emphasizing the need for transparent and credible assessments in judicial matters. In his remarks, he highlighted how statements from twenty members fell short of delivering substantive criticism or support for Gratteri, thus raising questions about the integrity of the judicial evaluation process.

In conjunction with these remarks about the CSM, Minister Nordio also shared his views on judicial reform in an interview, where he discussed the historical context of fascism and antifascism in Italian judiciary discussions, asserting that the ongoing reform can be viewed as antifascist in nature. He claimed that any attempts to categorize the current judicial landscape using outdated notions would be misguided. In his perspective, the evolving nature of the criminal procedure code, which has undergone numerous amendments since its inception, reflects a need for continual adaptation to modern democratic values.

Nordio's comments serve to highlight the tensions within the Italian justice system, particularly in terms of institutional evaluations and ongoing legal reforms. His criticism of the CSM underscores a broader discourse on the credibility of judicial institutions and the importance of ensuring that the rule of law is maintained without excessive political influence. As discussions on reform unfold, the balance between maintaining judicial integrity and the political pressures surrounding it will be pivotal for Italy's legal future.