Justice Minister Carlo Nordio has publicly challenged the Superior Council of the Judiciary (CSM) following a defense of prosecutor Nicola Gratteri by twenty of its thirty members, in the context of an ongoing referendum about judicial reform in Italy. Nordio's comments express discontent towards the Council's convoluted statements, which he believes undermines the credibility of their position, arguing that such rhetoric distracts from substantive arguments and breeds unnecessary conflict.

The controversy surrounding Gratteri has intensified, particularly from right-wing factions, who criticize the prosecutor’s previous statements and actions. Critics argue that his stance could be detrimental to judicial reform efforts and raise concerns over his approach to handling legal matters. The division within the CSM, exemplified by the broad support for Gratteri from the left and mixed reactions from the right, sheds light on the polarized nature of Italian politics regarding judicial independence and reform.

The repercussions of this controversy extend beyond the present debate, as it raises questions about the future of judicial reform in Italy. With the referendum approaching, the failure or success of these reforms could significantly impact not only the judiciary but also the political landscape in Italy as both sides prepare for what may be a contentious vote. The implications of Nordio's statements and the support for Gratteri will likely resonate during the upcoming referendum and in discussions around the independence of the judiciary in Italy.