The Parliamentary Investigative Committee (CPI) in Sorocaba concluded its work on October 12, 2023, focused on alleged financial misconduct in the health department under Mayor Rodrigo Manga’s administration. The report, presented by CPI rapporteur Cristiano Passos, indicated that the committee had voted with 14 in favor, 4 against, and 6 absences, leading to the submission of the findings to the Public Ministry. This marked a significant step in addressing concerns over public fund management in the city. However, issues arose shortly after the voting, as councilors Fernando Dini and Fernanda Garcia raised discrepancies regarding their participation. Dini, who had voted in favor, later claimed he was absent during the vote, while Garcia, listed as absent, asserted that she had voted 'no' against concluding the report, advocating for continued investigation. This clash highlights potential inconsistencies in the voting process and raises questions about governance transparency in local politics. The implications of this situation extend beyond individual discrepancies; it points to broader concerns about accountability in public service governance. As the CPI's findings move forward to the Public Ministry, the conflicting statements from these councilors may complicate the narrative and public trust in local political institutions. The ongoing discussions about accountability and proper management of public resources are crucial for Sorocaba as it navigates this investigation and the ensuing legal ramifications.