In the column, the author expresses frustration over the actions of Dias Toffoli related to the Master case, labeling them as indefensible and ridiculous. They highlight that new revelations indicate Toffoli's deeper involvement with the case than previously thought. The use of strong adjectives reflects the growing concern over the implications of Toffoli's decisions on the integrity of judicial processes in Brazil.

The author suggests that while it is tempting to vilify everyone associated with controversial figures such as Jeffrey Epstein, it is essential to avoid blanket assumptions about guilt. The column suggests caution in applying such labels indiscriminately, as doing so could lead to misconceptions about the nature of the relationships and dealings these individuals had. This discussion opens a broader conversation about accountability and the complexities of legal judgments within the Brazilian judicial system.

Additionally, the author hints at the implications of liberalism in contemporary Brazil, suggesting that these political ideologies might have some influence over the muddied waters of justice and legality. Given the current political climate, the fate of individuals in high court positions like Toffoli holds significant weight over public trust and the overall direction of justice in the country.