Justice Dias Toffoli of Brazil's Supreme Court decided to withdraw from overseeing the Master case, a decision that unfolded over the course of one day. Initially, Toffoli firmly dismissed the option of stepping down, claiming that doing so would suggest an admission of guilt amidst increasing pressures from various sources. He conveyed his reluctance to colleagues, emphasizing that he did not want to appear culpable in the ongoing investigation.

However, as discussions progressed with advisers and fellow justices, Toffoli reconsidered his stance. The consensus among his peers was that his continued involvement could further strain the court's reputation and that the scrutiny placed on him would likely intensify. This change of heart was noticeably influenced by a meeting convened by Court President Edson Fachin, where the details outlined in a police report which linked Toffoli to potential misconduct in relation to the Master Bank were presented.

Toffoli's eventual decision to withdraw is significant as it underscores the internal and external pressures faced by the Supreme Court in Brazil, particularly in high-stakes cases involving corruption allegations. This situation not only impacts Toffoli's career but also raises concerns about the integrity of the judicial system, as the relationships within the court and with external entities like banks come under intense scrutiny. The implications of this case could affect public trust in the judiciary and highlight the challenges faced by legal institutions in maintaining their independence and credibility during politically charged investigations.