The article discusses Minister José Antonio Dias Toffoli's controversial decision to impose the highest level of secrecy on the investigations into the Master Bank scandal. It critiques this move as a step that benefits the powerful in Brasília, suggesting it places Toffoli in a position where he aligns himself with the interests of banker Daniel Vorcaro and his network. Within weeks, it appears that Toffoli's involvement in the case has already been detrimental, leading to calls for his removal as it becomes clear that the secrecy was an inappropriate measure.

The author draws parallels between Toffoli's actions and historical political figures, noting how former U.S. President Lyndon Johnson dealt with the immense power of J. Edgar Hoover, the former FBI director. This reference implies that just as Johnson learned to manage Hoover's influence, Toffoli's attempts to centralize control over the investigation may backfire. The piece suggests that Toffoli underestimated the necessity of cooperation with other agencies, particularly the Federal Police of Brazil, leading to a precarious situation that could ultimately erode trust in the judicial process.

Furthermore, the article raises concerns about the implications of such secrecy for transparency and accountability in governance. The author implies that not only is public trust in the institutions at risk, but also the integrity of the investigations may be compromised when powerful figures attempt to manipulate outcomes behind closed doors. The criticism of Toffoli signifies a broader apprehension regarding how power dynamics can corrupt processes intended to enforce justice, calling for increased scrutiny and accountability in high-profile cases.