Hugo Motta, the President of the Chamber of Deputies, expressed his support for Minister Dias Toffoli's role as the former rapporteur of the Master case at the Supreme Court of Brazil. During an interview, he highlighted that Toffoli acted with fairness and balance, fulfilling all requisitions made by the Public Ministry and the Federal Police, and dismissed criticisms aimed at Toffoli as being exaggerated, particularly emphasizing the media's portrayal of his contributions.

In discussing the Master case, Motta criticized the parliamentary inquiry commission (CPI) within the Senate, suggesting that its current direction has shifted inappropriately from its original objectives. He accused members of the CPI of attempting to utilize the inquiry for political gains, referring to it as a means to create an electoral platform rather than focusing on the case's core issues. This implies a concern about the politicization of the inquiry process, which should ideally remain a transparent investigation into judicial matters.

Motta's comments reflect broader political tensions in Brazil, particularly involving the interactions between legislative groups and the judiciary. His defense of Toffoli indicates an alignment with the judiciary against potential overreach from legislative scrutiny, signaling a protection of judicial independence amid political battles that may affect the integrity of ongoing investigations and the intended roles of different branches of government.