The article by Maciej Gutowski and Piotr Kardas delves into the upcoming elections for judges to fill vacancies in Poland's Constitutional Tribunal. There is a prevailing public discourse surrounding the law that defines how judicial representatives are elected to the National Judicial Council (KRS) and discussions about restoring the rule of law. These debates have overshadowed more immediate concerns regarding the selection of new Constitutional Tribunal judges, which is scheduled to take place in early March by the current ruling coalition. The article highlights the lack of public interest and transparency surrounding the nomination process for these crucial judicial positions.

Currently, there seems to be an informal agenda surfacing about the intention to expedite the selection process, which may undermine the necessary public scrutiny and thorough debate associated with such critical judicial appointments. The implications of hastily chosen judges could further entrench the ruling party's influence over the judiciary, raising alarms among critics who fear that this could threaten the independence of the judicial system in Poland. The authors express concern that the focus on other legal reforms could divert attention from the immediate need for a transparent and fair process in judicial appointments, posing risks to Poland's democratic principles.

In conclusion, the looming elections for the Constitutional Tribunal judges, combined with the current discourse on judicial reforms, represents a pivotal moment for Poland's legal landscape. The choices made in this delicate situation could reshape the judicial framework, impacting the rule of law in the country for years to come. The article invites readers to consider the consequences of these decisions and the far-reaching effects they could have on Polish democracy and governance.