Poland's ruling Law and Justice party (PiS) has filed a complaint with the Constitutional Tribunal, questioning the constitutionality of the provisions regarding the selection of judges for the Tribunal. This complaint, which was submitted in early February, indicates that a group of PiS lawmakers seeks to declare certain legal norms incompatible with the constitution, specifically targeting the statute on the status of the Constitutional Tribunal judges and regulations of the Sejm. The controversy arises from the group's concerns over the continuity of the Tribunal's operations and the questions surrounding the validity of swearing in new judges by the President.

The PiS lawmakers have raised allegations that the collective election of judges to the Constitutional Tribunal contradicts constitutional principles. This move is viewed as a strategic attempt to delay or manipulate the election process, which has been a contentious issue in Poland’s political landscape. Furthermore, discussions are ongoing regarding potential candidates for the vacant positions, further complicating the dynamics within the Tribunal as the government coalition plans to act swiftly to fill these vacancies.

This situation reflects broader tensions in Poland concerning the judicial system's independence and the government's influence over the courts. The procedural complaints raised by the PiS may set a significant precedent for future judicial appointments and the functioning of the Constitutional Tribunal, potentially impacting the rule of law in the country. As the government coalition moves ahead with efforts to fill vacancies, the repercussions of this complaint could reverberate throughout Poland's political and legal spheres, posing essential questions about judicial integrity and separation of powers in the face of ongoing political strife.