In Poland, the ruling coalition led by the Law and Justice party (PiS) is set to choose judges for six vacancies in the Constitutional Tribunal, scheduled for early March. This process involves an individual voting mechanism in the Sejm, in accordance with the Polish Constitution. However, PiS has filed a motion challenging the competence of the Sejm to regulate the rules and procedures for nominating and selecting candidates for judges of the Tribunal, indicating their belief that current procedures may be unconstitutional.

PiS argues that the existing regulations allow for the selection of judges to be swayed by the internal organization of the Sejm, which they claim undermines the integrity of the selection process. They assert that allowing the Sejm to determine the required majority for the election of judges could lead to a situation where candidates who align with opposing political factions are favored, potentially compromising the independence of the judiciary. This has raised concerns about the stability and impartiality of judicial appointments within the political landscape of Poland.

The implications of this motion could extend beyond just the immediate appointment of judges, as it highlights a broader struggle between the ruling party and the judiciary in Poland. If accepted, PiS's motion could lead to significant delays in filling these judicial vacancies, which in turn might affect ongoing and future legal proceedings in the country. The evolving situation underscores the tensions within Poland's political system and raises fundamental questions about the separation of powers and the rule of law in the face of shifting parliamentary dynamics.