Latvia has been deliberating on the regulation of distance learning in primary schools for several years. The Ministry of Education claims that children learn better in-person, but there has yet to be a thorough research study conducted in Latvia to evaluate the efficacy of distance education. Currently, policymakers are striving to create uniform standards and oversight for distance learning programs, leading to concerns about the adequacy of current educational practices and the potential impacts of restrictions on distance learning.

Parents are amongst those voicing their concerns about potential limitations on distance learning, citing reasons such as the need to protect their children. Personal testimonies from students involved in distance education, including experiences shared by students named Richie and Victoria, highlight the adaptability of this learning format and its benefits. As distance learning has seen a significant increase in enrollment — from around 3,300 students in 2016 to over 12,000 currently — lawmakers are faced with the challenge of balancing educational policy with the needs of families opting for this mode of education.

The debate continues as critics argue that targeting distance learning without concrete research may lead to ineffectual educational policies, particularly for students who may not thrive in traditional classroom settings. Questions arise regarding the motivations behind the push for regulation, including whether there is a stigma surrounding students who do not perform well in conventional schooling and are sent to study remotely. As such, the need for further investigation and informed policy-making becomes critical in ensuring that educational approaches serve all students effectively.