The Latvian Media Ethics Council has raised concerns about the content published by the Russian-language portal 'Meduza', which is registered in Latvia. The article highlighted a reader's letter discussing the war in Ukraine, which the Council claims does not represent a balanced portrayal of the situation. It was argued that the letter supports narratives consistent with Kremlin propaganda, minimizes Russia's responsibility for the invasion, and relativizes the aggression against Ukraine.

The complainant emphasized that the letter employed specific propaganda techniques that align with Kremlin narratives, framing the war in a way that absolves Russia of blame. The publication's approach has been viewed as irresponsible, as it potentially misleads readers and undermines the reality of the conflict. In response to the criticism, 'Meduza' stated that by publishing such letters, it aims to provide a diversity of opinions and includes a disclaimer indicating that the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the editorial stance.

Despite this defense, the Ethics Council concluded that the publication of this letter did not add any value to the discourse and could contribute to spreading misinformation. This situation raises important questions about media responsibility, the role of editorial discretion, and the potential impact of disseminating narratives that align with propaganda, particularly in the context of ongoing conflict and war.