Ministers of Brazil's Supreme Court, known as STF, are reportedly deeply uncomfortable and even angry about how the court's reputation has been harmed by the generalized criticism they face as a collective body. They emphasize the need to distinguish between the individual actions of each minister rather than allowing the entirety of the court to be judged by the actions of a few, asserting that this could undermine the institution's credibility and integrity.

The ministers argue that, like in any sector, there exists both good and bad within their ranks, and it is crucial for the competent members to be clearly differentiated from those whose actions may harm the court's image. Unfortunately, they feel that this distinction is not being made, and as a result, the reputation of the entire court suffers, impacting public perception and trust.

This issue appears to be handled reactively rather than proactively, as the ministers adopt a protective attitude towards one another under the misguided belief that it defends the institution as a whole. However, they acknowledge that this approach may actually lead to greater harm, as it safeguards those who may be contributing to the crisis rather than addressing the underlying problems directly. Thus, calls for reform or a reevaluation of internal standards are becoming increasingly urgent within the Supreme Court.