Faced with the Master bank scandal, the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) is attempting to regain public trust by moving forward on cases that resonate positively with the public. The timing of the high-profile trial involving the perpetrators of the assassination of Marielle Franco and Anderson Gomes could not be more critical for the court's image, as it seeks to showcase its accountability and commitment to justice at a time of crisis. Publicizing actions that reflect the court's responsibility is essential for boosting confidence among the public.

Moreover, justices Flávio Dino and Gilmar Mendes are expediting decisions on cases that have been pending, focusing on issues with substantial public interest, such as salary add-ons for civil servants and the misuse of parliamentary amendments. These topics have garnered significant attention and are likely to attract favorable public response. If the court can make meaningful progress on these fronts, it would represent a positive outcome from the scandal that has otherwise harmed its reputation severely.

While any positive strides are commendable, there remains a concern that the STF's current actions may be seen as reactive rather than proactive solutions for long-standing issues. The hope is that such urgency does not compromise the field's integrity or lead to superficial resolutions but rather results in sustainable changes that genuinely address the underlying issues within the judicial system.