The article traces the trajectory of Brazil's Supreme Court (STF) over the past decades, highlighting its evolution from a respected institution to a target of skepticism due to politicization and controversies.
The article examines the evolution of Brazil's Supreme Court (STF) over the last few decades, revealing how it became embroiled in cases that challenge its legitimacy and impartiality, with the recent Master case exemplifying these issues. Initially, the STF's role was largely hands-off, but the 1988 Constitution expanded its powers significantly, leading the court to intervene in virtually all national debates. This expansion of influence arose partly from the passivity of other branches of government and the declining engagement of civil society.
Over the years, what was once celebrated as judicial activism has devolved into behavior characterized by personal agendas, unethical conduct, politicized rulings, and allegations of favoritism that have tainted the court's overall reputation. The article poignantly highlights the public sentiment that today’s STF is the 'ugly child' of the judiciary, an entity that many refuse to acknowledge or take responsibility for, despite having contributed to its current state of disrepute.
In the broader context, the article reflects on the implications of the STF's fall from grace, illustrating how the court's actions have affected public trust in the judiciary and the balance of power within Brazil's political system. As the STF continues to navigate its controversial legacy, it faces the challenge of restoring its integrity and public confidence amid growing dissatisfaction and doubts about its role in Brazilian democracy.
