R. Vaikšnoras addressed the internal disagreements among coalition partners regarding the Kapčiamiesčio training ground, stating that the military had fulfilled its responsibilities by providing clear requirements for the training facility. He expressed that it was up to coalition partners to resolve their issues internally, indicating that he could not comment further on the political divergences. Vaikšnoras acknowledged that communication with local residents might not have been handled perfectly, yet he stressed that the military had explained the necessity of the facility to the public.

He noted that opinions were divided among the public; while some individuals recognized the importance of national security and having a trained army capable of defending citizens, others remained skeptical or unconvinced. The comments highlighted a certain frustration with citizens who do not prioritize Lithuania’s defense capabilities as a significant concern. Vaikšnoras' statements reflect the ongoing tension between military objectives and local public sentiment, as well as the challenges of ensuring adequate communication in defense matters.

In addition to these remarks, the surrounding political landscape was mentioned, particularly citing R. Kaunas, who had prematurely celebrated the resolution of the Kapčiamiesčio training ground issue, drawing criticism from fellow politicians like R. Žemaitaitis. This situation showcases the complexities of governance and military integration into national defense strategies, as differing views among lawmakers and the general populace can lead to challenges in moving forward with crucial defense initiatives.