In a recent closed court session at the Lithuanian Court of Appeal, prosecutors articulated their request to impose a tougher sentence on former politician K. Bartoševičius. During the ongoing sessions, which included the presentation of closing arguments by the prosecutor and the representatives of the victims, the prosecutor emphasized the consistency of their position with the arguments laid out in the appeal. However, specific details about the case's evidence and arguments were not disclosed to the journalists following the proceedings.

Prosecutor Donatas Skrebiškis, who is involved in the case against Bartoševičius, acknowledged that he had formally asked the court to amend the judgment from the first instance, which had sentenced the former politician to seven years in prison. The prosecution is now advocating for a more severe sentence of ten years, aiming to apply stricter penal measures based on the information presented during the trial.

This case not only raises questions about the judicial process in Lithuania but also highlights the ongoing scrutiny of former politicians and their accountability for actions while in office. The outcome of this appeal could set a precedent for future cases involving political figures and their legal responsibilities, influencing public trust in the legal system and governance.