Aleksandrs Bartaševics, the suspended chairman of Rēzekne City Council, has stated his intention to appeal the decision made by the State Security Service (VDD) regarding his access to state secrets. The VDD's refusal is based on several factors, including ongoing criminal proceedings involving Bartaševics, a previous administrative case of his dismissal, and his public statements regarding the dismantling of monuments. During an interview with Latvian Radio, Bartaševics emphasized that he believes the VDD's decisions are not legally justified.

In response to questions about the reasons behind the VDD's denial of access, Bartaševics indicated that he is aware of the allegations against him, which have given rise to criminal proceedings, albeit without conclusive evidence proving guilt in court. He criticized the VDD for disregarding the presumption of innocence, a fundamental principle in legal contexts, implying that the ongoing investigations should not preclude his eligibility for state security clearance.

Bartaševics reaffirmed his commitment to challenge both the VDD's ruling and the ministerial order leading to his suspension, arguing that these actions undermine due process. His case not only highlights the complexities of political accountability and state security regulations in Latvia but also raises broader questions about the implications of public statements made by politicians regarding sensitive national issues, such as the treatment of historical monuments.