K. Bartoševičius, after a court session at the Lithuanian Court of Appeal, spoke positively about the day's proceedings, stating that witnesses had provided important information that he hopes the court will consider. While he refrained from disclosing the content or identities of the witnesses, he believes their statements have been beneficial to his case.

The lawyer representing Bartoševičius, Oleg Šibkovas, communicated to the media that they had requested the court to summon more witnesses, but this request was denied. He explained that the court deemed the information obtained during this session sufficient for their proceedings. Despite the setback, Šibkovas confirmed that the examination of evidence in the case has concluded, and the next session is scheduled for March 5, during which final remarks will be made.

The implications of this case may extend beyond Bartoševičius himself, as it highlights the judicial system's handling of witness testimonies and the rights of defendants to present additional witnesses in their favor. The court's decision not to allow more witnesses may stir discussions about judicial processes in Lithuania and the importance of comprehensive evidence presentation in trials.