The trial of nine individuals accused in connection with the Yelwata attack that occurred on June 13, 2025, has faced delays in proceedings at the Federal High Court in Abuja. On the latest hearing date, it was revealed that the 7th and 8th defendants lacked legal counsel, which prompted questions from the presiding judge, Justice Joyce Abdulmalik. These two defendants stated that they believed they were being represented by Ibrahim Angulu, the lawyer for the 1st defendant, though Angulu indicated his intent to withdraw from their case.

As the court proceedings commenced, tensions arose when it became clear that Angulu was not prepared to represent the two defendants, leading to confusion over their representation. Angulu expressed surprise at the claim that he was acting for the 7th and 8th defendants, asserting that he had been led to believe he was no longer responsible for their legal defense due to a message he had received. This situation has created complications for the defendants and has stalled the trial, highlighting the issues surrounding legal representation in the context of high-profile trials in Nigeria.

The implications of these legal proceedings are significant, not only for the defendants involved but also for the broader justice system in Nigeria. As the court awaits a pathology report that could be pivotal to the trial's progression, the delays underscore ongoing challenges including access to legal counsel and the management of high-stakes criminal cases. With the case's outcome having potential ramifications for public safety and justice in Benue State, it remains a critical issue warranting close observation by legal experts and the public alike.