The Supreme Court in Poland is currently experiencing significant challenges in filling the position of the first president, with ongoing difficulties in candidate nominations. Recent attempts to elect a new president have been thwarted due to an insufficient number of judges participating in the assembly, as noted by spokesperson Igor Zgoliński. The assembly requires at least 75 judges to achieve a lawful quorum; however, only 51 judges attended the most recent meeting, making the election unsuccessful. This lack of participation raises concerns about both the engagement of judges and potential political influences in the selection process.

Moreover, the article highlights that the unsuccessful attempts to elect a first president reflect deeper issues within the judiciary. Previous candidates have either withdrawn or declined to participate amidst political pressures and uncertainty surrounding the judicial system in Poland. The situation has become increasingly tense, with existing judges, often referred to as 'old judges', voicing their concerns about the selection process and its implications for judicial independence. The context illustrates a judiciary grappling with not just procedural challenges, but also fundamental questions regarding its autonomy and integrity in the face of ongoing political developments.

Looking forward, the next attempt to form a quorum and move forward with the election is scheduled shortly, underscoring the urgency of filling the leadership position within the Supreme Court. The continuous failure to elect a leader may have significant implications for the court's authority and effectiveness, as it seeks to navigate the legal and political landscape in an increasingly polarized environment. The outcome of these elections will be critical not only for the court itself but for the rule of law in Poland as a whole.