On Tuesday at 11 a.m., the Supreme Court will convene a general assembly of judges to select candidates for the position of President of the Supreme Court, as the current head, Małgorzata Manowska, will see her term end in May. Manowska was appointed to this role six years ago after a highly controversial election process that raised significant doubts regarding its legitimacy. The previous selection process was marked by a prolonged six-day deliberation, during which participants questioned the validity and conduct of the election, highlighting the contentious nature of judicial appointments in Poland.

This time, there appears to be a more orderly approach to the nomination process, though challenges remain regarding the required quorum for a valid election. The new regulations governing the selection procedure may lead to a smoother process, but it remains uncertain whether the candidates will be finalized during Tuesday's meeting. This context underscores the ongoing tensions within the Polish judiciary and the scrutiny that surrounds changes in its leadership, as various factions within the judiciary continue to voice their dissent regarding prior election outcomes.

The upcoming assembly comes amid broader discussions about the state of the judiciary in Poland and potential boycotts of the election by certain judges, who express concerns over the integrity and transparency of the process. As the legal community watches closely, this election will serve as a barometer for future judicial reforms and the ongoing political struggles that influence the judiciary's independence in Poland.