Supreme Court judges in Poland have raised concerns about the legality of the upcoming election to choose a successor for the current president, Małgorzata Manowska. They argue that the process is tainted because the candidates for the new president are neo-judges, whose appointments have been deemed flawed. The judges initially scheduled an assembly to select candidates but did not attend due to the lack of a quorum, citing their concerns about the legitimacy of the neo-judges' involvement in the process. This situation reflects ongoing tensions regarding judicial independence and the rule of law in Poland.

Małgorzata Manowska, who is currently serving as the president of the Supreme Court, has announced she will not run for a second term. Despite this, there is concern over her efforts to legitimize the neo-judges before her departure, specifically by overturning a significant resolution made by the full Supreme Court in 2020. If this resolution is overturned, it could set a precedent that may further erode the legal foundations of the judiciary in Poland, highlighting the ongoing struggle between different political factions regarding judicial appointments.

The situation underscores the broader implications for Poland's judicial system and democratic governance. As different factions attempt to control the judiciary, the independence of judges and the entire legal apparatus is at risk. This controversy serves as a microcosm of the larger conflict over democratic values and the rule of law in Poland, raising questions about the future of judicial integrity and fairness in light of the current political climate.