In a recent court session at the Lithuanian Court of Appeal, Augustinas Vaičiūnas, the attorney for R. Malinauskas, the mayor of Druskininkai, argued for a new ruling in light of claims that the financial sums cited were allocated for legitimate legal services. The defense maintains that Malinauskas should not be held accountable for the alleged actions of his former advisor, Aivaras Kadziauskas, suggesting that an individual cannot be deemed guilty for the actions of another. Vaičiūnas highlighted that Kadziauskas acted independently and that Malinauskas had no knowledge of decisions being made regarding influencing judges.

Conversely, the General Prosecutor's Office insists that the individuals found guilty of corruption regarding the illegal construction of the Vijūnėlės dvaras in Druskininkai should have their sentences upheld, and that all appeals, including that of Malinauskas, should be dismissed. The prosecution's position emphasizes the need for accountability for corrupt practices that threaten public trust and governance in the region.

This case underscores broader concerns about corruption in Lithuanian politics, as the outcome will not only impact Malinauskas's political future but also set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the judicial system. The implications of the court's decision will resonate within the local governance framework, as the relationship between elected officials and their advisors is scrutinized in light of ethical conduct and legal responsibilities.