In an interview with Anna Sauka, an associate professor of ethics, the discussion revolves around the necessity of the humanities in today's world, which often prioritizes immediate economic benefits. Ivars Austers poses the critical question of whether humanistic studies are still relevant in a society increasingly focused on tangible economic outputs. Sauka argues that the question should pertain to science as a whole, suggesting that the idea of 'sellable science' is misleading and that the very nature of science goes beyond mere economic gain.

Sauka addresses the cynicism that pervades contemporary viewpoints on capitalism, where the value of humanistic studies is often questioned due to their perceived lack of direct financial return. She contends that such perceptions do not reflect the true contributions of the humanities, which are integral to promoting critical thought and understanding human experience. This misrepresentation extends to broader scientific domains as well, where practical applications are often overstated, thus challenging the validity of dismissing the humanities based on practicality alone.

The conversation highlights the tension between economic expectations and the intrinsic value of knowledge. Sauka advocates for the essential freedom within scientific inquiry, emphasizing that the pursuit of knowledge should not be subjugated to the whims of immediate economic returns. This perspective is crucial for fostering a more profound appreciation of the humanities and their role in enriching societal understanding and moral considerations in the face of rapid economic change.