The article features a conversation with Associate Professor of Ethics Anna Sauka, in which the necessity of humanities in today’s increasingly economically driven world is debated. Ivars Austers raises the question of why the humanities are needed when there is a prevailing demand for immediate economic gain from knowledge production. Anna Sauka responds by affirming that this concern applies to science as a whole, suggesting that the notion of 'marketable science' doesn't align with the true essence of scientific inquiry.

Sauka critiques the prevalent cynicism that frames everything in terms of profitability, indicating that such a mindset overlooks the intrinsic value of humanistic studies. She argues that the humanities are often unfairly marginalized, with claims of impracticality disregarding the meaningful contributions they offer. Moreover, she points out that many other fields of science also grapple with practical application, yet they do not face the same scrutiny as the humanities.

This conversation highlights an ongoing tension between the economic demands placed on educational and scientific institutions and the necessary intellectual freedom required for true academic exploration. Sauka advocates for a re-evaluation of how we value disciplines that do not produce immediate financial returns, suggesting that cultural and ethical insights from the humanities remain crucial in understanding the human condition amidst technological advancements.