In his book "Las constituciones latinoamericanas: la Constitución de Cádiz y su legado en la América española" (2015), C.J. Mirow outlines the history of constitutions in Latin America, emphasizing the significant influence of the Cádiz Constitution of 1812, also known as 'La Pepa.' Mirow argues that this document taught Latin American countries that constitutions are more of a suggestion rather than binding law, subject to modifications driven by political winds. This notion of constitutional flexibility has played a crucial role in shaping the political landscape of the region.

The backdrop of this constitutional discussion stems from the political crisis ignited by the abduction of King Fernando VII by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1808. This event led to a power vacuum across the Spanish Empire, prompting various factions to convene in the Cortes of Cádiz. Representatives from various Spanish colonies in the Americas participated in this assembly, aiming to preserve the kingdom's integrity while drafting a constitution that would guide governance. This process represented a significant shift in political thought, as it included the voices of colonial representatives in the legal framework of the empire.

Mirow's work thus highlights the long-lasting repercussions of the Cádiz Constitution on contemporary Latin American constitutionalism. The ongoing interpretative nature of constitutions as non-binding documents continues to inform political practices and reforms throughout the region, reflecting the struggles of these nations in establishing stable governance structures amid fluctuating political environments.