The article addresses the fundamental principles of public administration in Brazil, focusing on its rational and objective nature, devoid of personal sentiments or biases. It asserts that public administrators are obligated to prioritize the law's rationale above their personal worldviews. Although this is a well-established concept dating back to the emergence of the rule of law, conflicts continue to arise in the daily practices of public administrators, particularly between subjective impulses and the objective duties expected of them.

Specifically, the text highlights ongoing challenges faced by public administrators, including the impersonal enforcement of regulatory actions and the misalignment between agency regulations and legislative authority. Instances of overly short deadlines for information requests illustrate how the principle of impersonality in public administration often suffers from a lack of understanding. These conflicts reflect a broader issue regarding the adherence to established legal frameworks, where personal biases might interfere with the objective execution of administrative duties.

Ultimately, the article calls for a renewed commitment to the foundational principles of public administration to ensure that the actions taken by agencies remain aligned with the intentions of the law, mitigating the tension between personal intentions and public responsibilities. It emphasizes the need for clarity and uniformity in regulatory practices to uphold the essential tenets of the rule of law and the integrity of public administration.