In an unprecedented shift in diplomatic norms, businessmen Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner have become the emissaries of President Donald Trump in addressing some of the most pressing international crises, such as the war in Ukraine and Iran's nuclear program. Their involvement in negotiations is seen as a reflection of Trump’s belief that geopolitical conflicts can be approached similarly to business negotiations, challenging the traditional roles of career diplomats. This approach has even led to tangible outcomes, notably a ceasefire agreement in Gaza, but has also garnered mixed reactions among U.S. allies and experts in international relations.

While Witkoff and Kushner's efforts have led to some immediate successes, significant skepticism remains about the effectiveness of what some describe as 'deal-maker diplomacy'. Critics argue that the complexities of identity, security, and political survival in ongoing conflicts cannot be adequately addressed through transactional negotiations that prioritize expediency over nuanced understanding. This tension underscores the broader debate about the role of traditional diplomacy in an era where business leaders increasingly play prominent roles in international affairs.

As the world watches these unconventional diplomatic efforts unfold, the implications of this approach remain unclear. The potential for quick agreements could be overshadowed by the risks of oversimplification and the neglect of deeper underlying issues. Ultimately, the effectiveness of this hybrid model, merging business acumen with diplomatic engagement, will likely be tested as these global crises persist, prompting further discussion about the future of diplomacy and the qualifications necessary for success in international negotiations.