In the past year, the Trump administration has increasingly turned to unconventional diplomacy, often sidelining traditional state department roles. This approach was exemplified by the administration's recent actions in Geneva, where key aides Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner engaged directly with Iranian, Russian, and Ukrainian representatives. This marks a significant shift from the norm of diplomatic engagement that has been orchestrated primarily through the Department of State and the National Security Council for decades.

In their discussions, Witkoff and Kushner aimed to tackle two significant global issues: the long-standing nuclear crisis with Iran and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, which is nearing its fifth anniversary. The use of non-traditional figures in high-stakes negotiations raises questions about the effectiveness and legitimacy of such engagements, especially given the sensitive nature of these issues. Critics argue that bypassing established diplomatic channels might undermine the intricate processes developed over years of diplomatic practice.

The implications of this approach could be far-reaching, not only shaping international relations in the near future but also setting a precedent for future administrations. If this trend continues, it may lead to an increasingly personalized and less institutionalized approach to foreign policy that relies heavily on the personal relationships of the president and his close associates rather than on veteran diplomats. This could dramatically alter how the United States engages with global issues, potentially impacting alliances and diplomatic norms across the world.