Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, both close associates of former President Donald Trump, have been tasked with handling significant international conflicts, specifically in Ukraine and Iran. However, their appointments have sparked controversy due to their perceived lack of diplomatic credentials. Critics, including Professor Hilmar Mjelde, argue that they are ill-equipped for such critical missions, particularly in dealing with figures like Vladimir Putin. This sentiment reflects broader concerns about Trump's unconventional leadership style and its impact on diplomatic norms and institutional integrity.

Despite the criticism, former Washington ambassador Kåre R. Aas has come to their defense, arguing that Kushner's experience in the Middle East could prove valuable, while Witkoff's inexperience might lend a fresh perspective to negotiations. Aas's defense highlights the complexities surrounding the appointment of unconventional figures in positions of power, where traditional qualifications are often overlooked in favor of personal connections and loyalty.

The article underscores a growing unease among political observers regarding the erosion of institutional norms under Trump's administration. The reliance on an "unorthodox peace duo" raises questions about the effectiveness of American diplomacy in addressing global conflicts and the potential long-term ramifications for international relations. As the geopolitical landscape becomes increasingly perilous, the qualifications and strategies of those in charge of peace negotiations could have far-reaching consequences.