The article discusses excessive regulations imposed on driving schools in Germany, particularly emphasizing a peculiar rule mandating a minimum air volume of three cubic meters per student during in-person instruction. This requirement, along with stipulations for adequate seating and workspace, raises operational costs for driving schools, which are ultimately passed on to students. The author questions whether such regulations significantly enhance traffic safety, pointing out the lack of evidence to support their effectiveness.

The piece argues that these overregulations exemplify broader issues within Germany's bureaucratic system, suggesting that the focus on unnecessary rules detracts from meaningful reforms that could improve both educational effectiveness and safety outcomes. The author contends that while the intention behind these regulations may be safety, they often lead to financial burdens for learners hoping to obtain their driving licenses, thereby potentially discouraging new drivers from entering the system.

In conclusion, the article calls for a reevaluation of these mandates, advocating for a more streamlined and sensible approach to driving education. By minimizing excessive regulations, the hope is to relieve financial pressures on students while still maintaining high standards of safety and education in driver training, ultimately fostering a system that benefits both the students and the overall traffic safety metrics in Germany.