The Polish government has passed a controversial act concerning the National Labour Inspectorate (PIP), which has sparked significant criticism from employers. Representatives from the business sector expressed concern over being given only seven days to respond to revised proposals, arguing that this timeframe is insufficient for meaningful consultation and contradicts principles of social dialogue. The rapid approval process has raised alarms about the adequacy of the law's scrutiny and its implications for employer-employee relations.

One of the most contentious aspects of the new law is the introduction of enhanced powers for regional labor inspectors, allowing them to reclassify civil contracts as employment contracts through administrative decisions. Employers fear that these broad powers may lead to constitutional challenges and complicate contractual relationships. Industry experts have also voiced concerns, suggesting that regulatory bodies should not wield such extensive authority to interfere in private contracts, as this could undermine business operations and employee rights.

In response to the adopted changes, the Polish Employers' Confederation is advocating for adjustments that would limit the immediate impact of inspector decisions. They propose that the consequences of such decisions should only take effect after the conclusion of any appeal proceedings or a court ruling. This suggestion highlights the ongoing tension between the government’s regulatory ambitions and the operational realities faced by businesses, necessitating a more balanced approach to labor law reform in Poland.