As Italy approaches the referendum on judicial reform scheduled for 34 days from now, tensions are escalating among political factions regarding the proposed changes to the judicial system, notably concerning the separation of magistrates' careers and the random selection of members for the new Superior Councils of the Judiciary (CSM). Minister of Justice Carlo Nordio recently stirred controversy by labeling the CSM's factions as a "mafia-like" mechanism, igniting a wave of backlash from various political and legal circles. This statement was made in a context where the stakes surrounding the referendum are high, as it reflects broader issues of accountability and integrity within Italy's judicial system.

Nino Di Matteo, the former anti-mafia prosecutor from Palermo and a politician involved in the matter, has responded directly to Nordio's comments indicating that his words have been taken out of context. Originally, Di Matteo used similar language in 2019 when presenting his candidacy for the CSM; however, the implications have now taken on heightened significance as the referendum looms. The discussion highlights the critical challenges facing the Italian judiciary, particularly in ensuring a fair and unbiased system, especially in light of the accusations that have arisen from Nordio's remarks.

The backlash against Nordio has implications not only for his political standing but also for public perception of the upcoming referendum, as it raises questions about the motives behind judicial reforms and their potential impact on the integrity of the legal system in Italy. With opposition mounting, it remains to be seen how this controversy will play out in the days leading up to the referendum and what it might mean for the future of judicial governance in the country.