Feb 16 β€’ 06:53 UTC πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar Al Jazeera

The State vs. the Militia: Confronting the Fragmentation Project in Sudan and Yemen

The article discusses the ongoing struggle between state authority and militia groups in Sudan and Yemen, highlighting the implications for Arab unity and governance.

The article examines the historical context of the Arab League's role since its inception in 1945, emphasizing its significance as a unifying symbol for Arab nations despite prevalent criticisms regarding its effectiveness. It reflects on the perspectives of leaders such as former Secretary-General Amr Moussa, who views the invasion of Kuwait as a pivotal moment that contributed to the disintegration of the Arab system. This backdrop sets the stage for understanding the critical importance of state sovereignty and the challenges posed by non-state actors like militias in contemporary regional conflicts.

The discussion further delves into the sociopolitical dynamics in Sudan and Yemen, where the authority of the state is increasingly undermined by the rise of militias. This trend is analyzed through the lens of influential theorists such as Max Weber and Thomas Hobbes, who emphasize the state’s monopoly on power as essential for human society. Despite the diminishing hopes surrounding post-colonial state projects, there is a significant consensus among the Arab populace regarding the need for strong governmental institutions to counteract fragmentation and chaos.

Ultimately, the article raises critical questions about the future of Arab unity and governance, suggesting that the persistence of militia groups not only threatens the stability of individual states but also undermines broader regional cooperation. As these conflicts unfold, the roles of the Arab League and member states in addressing the challenges posed by fragmentation become increasingly crucial, prompting a reevaluation of strategies aimed at restoring order and solidarity in the Arab world.

πŸ“‘ Similar Coverage