The film 'Kremlin Sorcerer' has raised discussions in Latvia about its alignment with Russian foreign policy and whether its narrative serves as a soft power tool. Though its main audience is expected to be in the West, the film's theme resonates with current geopolitical dynamics, prompting concerns among local cultural critics. Producer Gints Grūbe voiced worries about the perception of such historical or pseudo-historical films, highlighting the risk that audiences might accept their portrayals as historical truths.

During the film's production, there was significant debate in Latvia about whether it was appropriate to film a story centered on Putin's power struggles in the country. Ultimately, once the film was ready for release, very few Latvian theaters chose to screen it, suggesting a local pushback against its themes. The producers of 'Kremlin Sorcerer' aimed primarily at a Western audience, which raises questions about cultural diplomacy and the role of cinema in shaping perceptions of contemporary issues associated with Russia.

The introduction of new criteria in Latvia to evaluate film projects—including the prohibition of promoting the political agenda of Russia or Belarus—reflects a broader resistance to narratives that might inadvertently support such regimes. Latvia's cinematic landscape is navigating the complexities of historical representation against the backdrop of contemporary political realities, making the reception of films like 'Kremlin Sorcerer' a significant commentary on the intersection of culture and politics in a post-Soviet state.