The film 'Kremlin Wizard' directed by acclaimed French director Olivier Assayas, which was shot in Riga and features local actors in minor roles, has sparked a heated debate in Latvia. Despite its extravagant budget of €23 million, the film has only grossed €4.1 million in France in three weeks. Central to the discussions in Latvia is the film's perceived pro-Putin narrative, with Dita Rietuma, director of the National Film Center, describing it as an example of 'total naivism.' Critics argue that the portrayal of Putin and his aides in a more humanized light runs the risk of justifying Kremlin policies.

Many viewers were initially excited about the film, especially with the anticipation surrounding British star Jude Law's involvement in Latvia, but that satisfaction has dwindled following the film's release. The narrative focuses on the shrewd and manipulative figures behind Putin's regime, particularly Vadim Baranov, known in reality as Vladislav Surkov. However, rather than being critical, the film has been interpreted by some as attempting to normalize or excuse the aggressive actions of the Russian government. This raises concerns regarding the film's impact and the ethical considerations inherent in its storytelling.

As discussions continue, there is a growing call among viewers and critics to scrutinize the messages conveyed through such portrayals. Opinions are divided on the extent to which the film's narrative assists the image of the aggressor. As Latvia grapples with the implications of this artistic interpretation, the controversy underscores broader discussions about the representation of political figures in media and the responsibilities of filmmakers in addressing current geopolitical issues.