The article focuses on the upcoming referendum on Justice in Italy, highlighting the importance of a respectful and legitimate voting process. It critiques the rhetoric surrounding the debate, particularly targeting the statements made by the anti-reform advocate Nicola Gratteri, who has suggested that those supporting the reform are corrupt. This divisive language is presented as a significant concern, as it undermines the foundations of democracy and can instill fear in citizens about being unjustly judged based on their political choices.

The author contends that the opposition to the Justice reform is not genuinely about the merits of the proposed changes but rather a political weapon against the government. They argue that many figures within the No camp initially agreed with the reform's substance before shifting their stance due to its association with the current administration. This shift is seen as a problematic trend, suggesting that political motivations are taking precedence over the real implications of the referendum on justice in Italy.

Ultimately, the piece calls for a more constructive dialogue around the Justice reform, emphasizing that citizens stand to gain from a Yes victory in the referendum. It urges voters to focus on the substance of the reform rather than succumb to the divisive tactics prevalent in the political arena. Such an approach could lead to a more just and effective legal system that serves the populace.