In the article, the author delves into the ongoing debate surrounding the upcoming referendum on Justice in Italy, prominently featuring the views of Nicola Gratteri, a prominent prosecutor. Gratteri asserts that it is the judiciary that engages in political maneuvering, rather than the other way around. He informs that certain groups, such as mafia affiliates, corrupt individuals, and those currently under investigation or prosecution, are expected to vote 'Yes' in support of the referendum. This perspective raises questions about the integrity and motivations of these voters, implicitly tying their choice to their personal stakes in the judicial outcomes.

The piece further explores who might vote 'No', drawing a contrast between the presumed innocence of regular citizens and the accused. The portrayal of those likely to support the referendum suggests a confluence of interests among criminals and the politically precarious, establishing a divide in public sentiment. The article hints at a complex interplay between justice and personal survival in a legal system where the lines between guilty and innocent are often blurred, especially in public perception.

Gratteri's commentary not only sheds light on the motivations behind the referendum but also prompts a broader discourse about the role of the judiciary in the political landscape of Italy. The implications of the voter base could reflect deeper societal sentiments about justice and governance, making this referendum a pivotal moment for assessing public trust in the legal system.