Recent investigations have unveiled communications suggesting that Judge Divoncir Schreiner Maran engaged in questionable legal maneuvers to grant house arrest to Gerson Palermo, a notorious leader of the Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC) who is serving a 126-year prison sentence. The G1 news outlet discovered details from a Disciplinary Administrative Process (PAD) opened by the National Justice Council (CNJ) that scrutinizes Maran's decision during a judicial plantão, or emergency session, amid the COVID-19 pandemic in Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul.

The evidence includes text messages from judicial aides indicating that the order for Palermo's habeas corpus was communicated before the formal filing process took place. One of the aides, Fernando Carlana, alerted a colleague about the impending arrival of the habeas corpus application, stating, "Gabriela, this HC is coming, the chief asked to grant it." This raises serious questions about the integrity of the judicial process, as the official distribution of the case happened more than two hours later.

This incident underscores a broader issue of judicial integrity and accountability, particularly concerning the handling of high-profile criminal cases in Brazil. The swift release of a convicted drug lord like Palermo not only compromises the justice system's credibility but also poses significant implications for public safety and the ongoing fight against organized crime in the country. Investigations and legal repercussions for the judge involved may follow, reflecting the tensions surrounding judicial practices in Brazil under scrutiny amidst rising crime rates.